Vol. 14 No. 1 (2023)
Studies

Educational Changes and Crisis Management

Ágnes Fazekas
ELTE PPK Felnőttképzés-kutatási és Tudásmenedzsment Intézet
Petronella Antoni-Alt
MCC, Tanuláskutató Intézet

Published 30-06-2023

Keywords

  • school management,
  • COVID,
  • educational changes,
  • sustainability,
  • research design

Abstract

This paper provides an insight into the results of a large-scale mixed-methods research series on educational change over a decade, the last phase of which coincided with the coronavirus epidemic, which provided an opportunity to analyse emergency changes. An important question was how to adapt to the changed environment using innovative research methods and what correlations can be assumed between school characteristics before the epidemic and responses to the crisis. The focus of this paper is accordingly twofold: it addresses both the issue of temporary and longer-term changes in research methods and dilemmas that address the relationship between crisis responses that lead to sustained school-level development and organizational conditions, leadership strategies, developmental knowledge and prior pedagogical practices. Building on the latter, our paper presents a model developed by the authors that describes the relationship between organisational behaviour and crisis responses, illustrated by case studies.

References

  1. Anka Á., Baráth T., Cseh Gy., Fazekas Á., Horváth L., Kézy Zs., Menyhárt A., Sipos J. (2016): Dél-alföld megújuló iskolái. SZTE. Szeged. Altrichter, H. (2005): Curriculum implementation – limiting and facilitating factors. Linz: Johannes Kepler University.
  2. Balázs É., Einhorn Á., Fischer M., Győri J., Halász G., Havas A., Kovács I. V., Lukács J., Szabó M., Wolfné Borsi J. (2011): Javaslat a nemzeti oktatási innovációs rendszer fejlesztésének stratégiájára. Budapest: Oktatáskutató és Fejlesztő Intézet.
  3. Balázs É., Fazekas Á., Fischer M., Győri J., Halász G., Kovács I. V., Molnár L., Szőllősi T., Vámos Á., Wolfné Borsi J. (2015): Okos Köznevelés: Javaslat a Nemzeti oktatási innovációs stratégia kiegészítésére - NOIR+ stratégia. Budapest: ELTE PPK. Kézirat.
  4. Ben-Peretz, M. (1975). The concept of curriculum potential. Curriculum Theory Network. Vol. 5/2. pp. 151–159. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179278
  5. Clamdinin, D. J., Connelly, F. M. (1992): Teacher as curriculum maker. In: Jackson P. W. (ed.) (1992): Handbook of Research on Curriculum. New York: Macmillan.
  6. Clark, Larry (2020): Innovation in a Time of Crisis”. Harvard Business Publishing, March 26, 2020 (online: https://www.harvardbusiness.org/innovation-in-a-time-of-crisis)
  7. Datnow, A., Park, V. (2009): Conceptualizing Policy Implementation: Large-Scale Reform in an Era of Complexity. In: Sykes, G., Schneider, B. and Plank, D. (eds.): Handbook of Education Policy Research. New York: Routledge. pp. 348–361.
  8. Deng, Z. (2011): Revisiting Curriculum Potential. Curriculum Inquiry. Vol. 41/5. pp. 538-559. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2011.00563.x
  9. Fazekas Ágnes (2021a): Közoktatás-fejelsztési beavatkozások hatásmechanizmusai. Budapest: MERSZ. https://doi.org/10.1556/9789634547150
  10. Fazekas Ágnes (szerk.) (2021b): Innováció az oktatásban. Budapest: MERSZ. https://doi.org/10.1556/9789634547143
  11. Ferdig, R. E., Baumgartner, E., Hartshorne, R., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Mouza, C. (2020): Teaching, Technology, and Teacher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Stories from the Field. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (online: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/216903/).
  12. Gunter, Helen M., Grimaldi, Emiliano, Hall, David, Serpieri, Roberto (2016): New Public Management and the Reform of Education European lessons for policy and practice. New York/London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315735245
  13. Halász Gábor, Fazekas Ágnes (2021): Who is innovating and how in the education sector? Combining subject and object approaches. Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1556/2059.2021.00042
  14. Halász Gábor (2021): Az oktatási innováció kutatása. in: Fazekas Ágnes (szerk.): Innováció az oktatásban. Budapest: MERSZ.
  15. Halász Gábor, Kovács István Vilmos, Pálvölgyi Lajos (szerk.) (2021): Oktatás, Technológia, Innováció. Helyzetkép és stratégia. Budapest: MERSZ. https://doi.org/10.1556/9789634547280
  16. Halász Gábor (2014): The OECD-Tohoku School project (A case of educational change and innovation in Japan). http://halaszg.elte.hu/download/Tohoku_report.pdf.
  17. Hopkins, D., Reynolds, D (2001): The Past, Present, and Future of School Improvement: Towards the Third Age. British Educational Research Journal. Vol. 27/4. pp. 459-475. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120071461
  18. Horváth László, Czirfusz Dóra, Misley Helga (2020): DiO - Digitális oktatási tapasztalatok. ELTE PPK. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341255394_DiO_-Digitalis_oktatasi_tapasztalatok
  19. Imre Anna, Fazekas Ágnes (2016): Elements of New Public Management in the context of the Hungarian education system, 1990-2010 in: Gunter, Helen M.- Grimaldi, Emiliano- Hall, David – Serpieri, Roberto (2016): New Public Management and the Reform of Education European lessons for policy and practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
  20. Kerber Z. (szerk.): Sokarcú implementáció. Kompetenciafejlesztő programcsomagok bevezetése a HEFOP 3.1.3 iskolákban. Budapest: Oktatáskutató és Fejlesztő Intézet. pp. 77–94.
  21. Kersánszki Tamás (2020): Természettudományi azon belül is a biztonságtudományi területet érintő fejlesztések és innovációk születése, implementációja és hatása az oktatási ágazatban. Budapest: Óbudai Egyetem. Kézirat.
  22. Kersánszki Tamás, Baráth Tibor, Fazekas Ágnes (2021): Do organizations learn? Results of a Hungarian longitudinal school-research program. Opus et Educatio. Vol 8, No 3. https://doi.org/10.3311/ope.473
  23. Lieberman, A. (1998): The growth of educational change as a field of study: understanding its roots and branches. In: Hargreaves, Lieberman, A. Fullan, M. and Hopkins D. (eds.): International handbook of educational change. London: Kluwer. pp. 13-20.
  24. Mischke, G. (2010): Towards Effective Curriculum Design in Open Distance Learning. Progressio. Vol. 3/2. pp. 145-163.
  25. OECD (2005): Oslo Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. Third edition. A joint publication of OECD and Eurostat.
  26. OECD (2013): Innovative Learning Environments. Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  27. OECD (2014): Measuring Innovation in Education: A New Perspective, Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264215696-en
  28. OECD (2020) School education during COVID-19: Were teachers and students ready? https://www.oecd.org/education/coronavirus-education-country-notes.htm
  29. OECD/Eurostat (2018), Oslo manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.). The measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities. OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg.
  30. Schleicher, Andreas (2021): THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON EDUCATION INSIGHTS FROM EDUCATION AT A GLANCE 2020. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/education/the-impact-of-covid-19-on-education-insights-education-at-a-glance-2020.pdf
  31. Semjén András, Le Marcell, Hermann Zoltán (2018). The goals and consequences of the centralization of public education in Hungary. Acta Educationis Generalis, 8(3), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2018-0015
  32. Taalbi, J. (2017): What drives innovation? Evidence from economic history. Research Policy, 46(8), 1437–1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.007
  33. Tingzhou, Li, Sha, Lu, Yuyang, Zhao, Wanying, Li (2021): Policy Analysis of Educational Services for the One Belt One Road Initiative under the COVID-19 Epidemic. In: Beijing International Review of Education. Online Publication Date: 30 Mar 2021. https://doi.org/10.1163/25902539-03010004
  34. United Nations. (2020, August 4). Policy Brief: Education during covid-19 and beyond. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/sg_policy_brief_covid19_and_education_august_2020.pdf.
  35. Zsigovits G. (szerk.) (2008): A közoktatás modernizációjáért. A kompetencia alapú pedagógiai rendszer fejlesztése és bevezetése a Nemzeti Fejlesztési Terv időszakában. Budapest: Educatio Társadalmi és Szolgáltató Közhasznú Társaság.