Évf. 15 szám 1 (2024)
Tanulmányok

Interszekcionalitás fogalma az oktatáspolitikai dokumentumokban: Kilenc európai ország összehasonlító elemzése

PDF (English)
Jekatyerina Dunajeva
HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences; Institute of International Studies and Political Science, BTK-Pazmany Peter Catholic University; Public Policy and Management Institute
Hanna Siarova
Public Policy and Management Institute
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61177/HISZ.2024.15.1.5

Megjelent 2024-06-28

Kulcsszavak

  • interszekcionalitás,
  • kiszolgáltatottság,
  • oktatási egyenlőtlenség,
  • oktatáspolitika

Copyright (c) 2024 Jekatyerina Dunajeva, Hanna Siarova

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Absztrakt

Az oktatási egyenlőtlenségek az elmúlt évtizedekben jelentős figyelmet kaptak empirikus és tudományos kutatásokban egyaránt, amelyekben rámutattak arra, hogy az interszekcionalitás fogalma nélkülözhetetlen a társadalmi kiszolgáltatottság és hátrányok megértéséhez. Mindezekhez kapcsolódóan ez a tanulmány bemutatja a Horizon 2020 kutatási és innovációs program által finanszírozott PIONEERED projekt eredményeit, melyek hangsúlyozzák az interszekcionalitás fontosságát az oktatáspolitikai elemzésekben, illetve a szakpolitikai döntéshozatalban. Továbbá a tanulmány kiemeli azt is, hogy az interszekcionalitás egyre szélesebb körben ismert fogalommá válik az oktatási egyenlőtlenségek terén végzett tudományos kutatásokban a kilenc PIONEERED projektben résztvevő országban, valamint elkezdett elterjedni az oktatásban érdekelt szereplők körében is. A kutatás során végzett elemzés rámutatott arra is, hogy bár a vizsgált országok mindegyikében az oktatási hátrányokra és egyenlőtlenségekre vonatkozó politikai felfogások idővel egyre összetettebbé váltak, ugyanakkor az interszekcionalitás fogalma az oktatáspolitikai dokumentumokban nem, vagy csak ritkán jelenik meg. Tekintettel a csekély tudásanyagra ebben a témában, ez a tanulmány egyedülálló módon vizsgálja, hogy az oktatáspolitikai dokumentumok milyen mértékben ismerik fel az interszekcionalitás fontosságát a kiszolgáltatott csoportok meghatározása során.

PDF (English)

Hivatkozások

  1. Álvarez de Sotomayor, A., & Martínez-Cousinou, G. (2016): Capital económico o cultural? El efecto del origen social sobre las desventajas académicas de los hijos de inmigrantes en España [Financial or Cultural Capital? The Effect of Social Origin on Educational Disadvantage of Children of Immigrants in Spain]. Papers. Revista de Sociologia, 101(4), 527–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.2200
  2. Alfageme-Chao, A., & García-Pastor, B. (2015): Notas sobre los gitanos y la formación de escuelas gueto en España [Notes on the Gypsies and the formation of ghetto schools in Spain]. Expressa Extensao, 20(1), Alfageme-Chao, A. and García-Pastor, B., 2015. Notas sobre los gitanos y la formación de escuelas gueto en España [Notes on the gypsies and the formation of ghetto schools in Spain]. Expressa Extensao, 20 (1), 33–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15210/ee.v20i01.5042
  3. Allweiss, A. (2014): Place, Culture and Gender in Intersectional Bilingual Education Practices in a Chuj Maya Town. In C. Grant, & E. Zwier, Intersectionality and Urban Education: identities, Policies, Spaces and Power (pp. 267-292). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  4. Andersen, A.-M., & Olsen, K. (2018): «Det stikker så smertelig, spesielt når man forsøker ...»: Norskspråklighet i samiske kjerneområder [It stings so painfully, especially when one tries: Norwegian language in Sami core areas]. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 102(1), 49–60. DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2987-2018-01-06
  5. Backes, S., & Hadjar, A. (2017): Educational trajectories through secondary education in Luxembourg: How does permeability affect educational inequalities? Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Bildungswissenschaften, 39(3), 437–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24452/sjer.39.3.5040
  6. Bankauskaite, R., & Dunajeva, K. (2022): Country report Lithuania on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Vilnius: PPMI.
  7. Benz, R., Seiler, S., & Erzinger, A. B. (2021): State of research report – definitions, conceptual approaches, empirical findings. TRANSFORMATIONS-22-2020: Enhancing access and uptake of education to reverse inequalities: Pioneered.
  8. Bešić, E. (2020): Intersectionality: A pathway towards inclusive education? Prospects, 49, pp. 111–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09461-6
  9. Bhopal, K. (2020): Confronting White privilege: the importance of intersectionality in the sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 41(6), 807-816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2020.1755224
  10. Blaskó, Z., de Costa, P., & Schnepf, S. (2021): Learning Loss and Educational Inequalities in Europe: Mapping the Potential Consequences of the COVID-19 Crisis [IZA DP No. 14298]. Retrieved from https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/14298/learning-loss-and-educational-inequalities-in-europe-mapping-the-potential-consequences-of-the-covid-19-crisis
  11. Bollig, S., & Jobst, S. (2022): Report on stakeholders’ knowledge about current practices tackling/reducing educational inequalities in each country. PIONEERED.
  12. Bollig, S., Joos, M., Bindges, A.-L., Herzer, M., Kliche, H., & Rottwinkel, F. (2022): Country report Germany on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and update of education. Trier: Universitat Trier.
  13. Budginaitė, I., & Mašidlauskaitė, R. (2015): Ar laukiami diasporos vaikai Lietuvoje? Tėvų ir mokytojų patirtys [Are children of diaspora welcome in Lithuania? Experiences of parents and teachers]. Politologija, 78(2), 94–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Polit.2015.2.8242
  14. Cárdenas-Rodríguez, R., Terrón-Caro, T., & Monreal Gimeno, M. (2019): Educación Primaria y alumnas gitanas. Análisis de las barreras sociales en contextos de exclusión [Primary education and romani girl students. Analysis of the social barriers in environments of exclusion]. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 37(1), 75–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.37.1.326221
  15. Cerna, L. (2013): The Nature of Policy Change and Implementation: A Review of Different Theoretical Approaches. OECD.
  16. Choo, H. (2012): The transnational journey of intersectionality. Gender and Society, 26(1), 40-45. DOI: 10.1177/0891243211426724
  17. Crenshaw, K. (1989): 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1, 139–67.
  18. Crenshaw, K. (1991): Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
  19. Csüllög, K., Lannert, J., & Zempléni, A. (2015): Számít a pedagógus és az iskola! A felülemelkedő (reziliens) tanulók teljesítményét befolyásoló tényezők az Országos kompetenciamérés adatai alapján [Teachers and school matter. Factors influencing performance of resilient students]. Budapest: Oktatási Hivatal.
  20. Cukrowska-Torzewska, E. (2014): Intersectionality of ethnicity and gender: exploring Romani women’s performance in education. Ekonomia. Rynek, Gospodarka, Społeczeństwo, 36, 51-89.
  21. Dambrauskas, K. (2020): Neoliberalios valdysenos įtaka Lietuvos tautinių mažumų švietimo politikai socialinės politikos kontekste [The influence of neoliberal governance on the education policy of Lithuanian national minorities]. Lietuvos Socialinė Raida, 9, 28–45.
  22. Darmody, M., & Smyth, E. (2022): Country report Ireland on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Dublin: The Economic and Social Research Institute.
  23. Dayton, B. W. (2000): Policy Frames, Policy Making and the Global Climate Change Discourse. In H. Addams, & J. L. Proops, Social Discourse and Environmental Policy: An Application of Q Methodology (pp. 71-87). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  24. D’Agostino, S. (2015): Consolidated Criteria for Assessing Intersectionality Operationalization in European Equality Policies: The Case of Roma Women. Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies, 2(1-2), 95–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11116/jdivegendstud.2.1-2.0095
  25. Dollmann, J. (2017): Positive choices for all? SES- and gender-specific premia of immigrants at educational transitions. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 49, 20–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.rssm.2017.03.001
  26. Dunajeva, J. (2016): A Pető Intézet, a Pető-módszer [the Pető Instutude and the Pető-method]. Új pedagógiai szemle [New Pedagogical Review], 66(7-8), 71-76.
  27. Dunajeva, J. (2022): Comparative analysis report on the evolution of concepts, definitions and prioritisation of vulnerable groups in public policy documents. PIONEERED.
  28. EDK. (2016): Declaration on the Principles for the Sustainable Integration of Late Immigrant Youth and Young Adults into the Labour Market and Society in Switzerland. Retrieved from Plenary Assembly decision: https://edudoc.ch/record/122607?ln=en
  29. Erzinger, A., Seiler, S., Winkler, A., Benz, R., & Cümen, D. (2022): Country report Switzerland on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Bern: PIONEERED.
  30. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2020): Equity in school education in Europe: Structures, policies and student performance. Eurydice report.
  31. European Parliament. (2023): European Parliament resolution of 4 October 2023 on the segregation and discrimination of Roma children in education. Retrieved from 2023/2840(RSP): https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0342_EN.html
  32. Garcia, T. C. (2022): Incorporating Intersectionality in Public Policy: A Systematic Literature Review. Humanity & Society, 46(2), 271-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01605976209885
  33. Hadjar, A., Fischbach, A., & Backes, S. (2018): Bildungsungleichheiten im luxemburgischen Sekundarschulsystem aus zeitlicher Perspektive. Retrieved from Nationaler Bildungsbericht Luxemburg: https://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/37752
  34. Hankivsky, O., & Jordan-Zachery, J. (2019): Introduction: Bringing Intersectionality to Public Policy. In O. Hankivsky, & J. Jordan-Zachery, The Palgrave Handbook of Intersectionality in Public Policy. The Politics of Intersectionality (pp. 1-28). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  35. Hankivsky, O., & Jordan-Zachery, J. (2019): Introduction: Bringing Intersectionality to Public Policy. In O. Hankivsky, & J. Jordan-Zachery, The Palgrave Handbook of Intersectionality in Public Policy. The Politics of Intersectionality (pp. 1-28). Palgrave Macmillan.
  36. Keller, L., Lüdtke, O., Preckel, F., & Brunner, M. (2023): Educational Inequalities at the Intersection of Multiple Social Categories: An Introduction and Systematic Review of the Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) Approach. Educ. Psychol. Rev., 35(31). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09733-5
  37. Kertesi, G., & Kézdi, G. (2012): A roma és nem roma tanulók teszteredményei közti különbségekről és e különbségek okairól [On the Roma/non-Roma test score gap and the reasons of this gap]. Budapesti Munkagazdaságtani Füzetek, 5.
  38. Kogan, I. (2011): New Immigrants ― Old Disadvantage Patterns? Labour Market Integration of Recent Immigrants into Germany: Labour market integration in Germany. International Migration, 49(1), 91–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00609.x
  39. Kuger, S., & Prein, G. (2021): Bildungsmobilität und Migrationshintergrund. Aufwachsen in Deutschland 2019. Alltagswelten von Kindern, Jugendlichen und Familien, 34–40.
  40. Lőrincz, B. (2022): Country report Hungary on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Budapest: Tárki.
  41. La Barbera, M. C., Cassain, L., & Caravantes, P. (2023): The discursive construction of intersectionality in public policy implementation. Critical Discourse Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2023.2228937
  42. Laganà, F., Chevillard, J., & Gauthier, J.-A. (2014): Socio-economic Background and Early Post-compulsory Education Pathways: A Comparison between Natives and Second-generation Immigrants in Switzerland. European Sociological Review, 30(1), 18–34. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jct019
  43. Liasidou, A. (2013): Intersectional understandings of disability and implications for a social justice reform agenda in education policy and practice. Disability & Society, 28(3), 299-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.710012
  44. Manuel, T. (2006): Envisioning the Possibilities for a Good Life: Exploring the Public Policy Implications of Intersectionality Theory. Journal of Women Politics & Policy, 28(3-4), 173–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J501v28n03_08
  45. Meili, D., Günther, I., & Harttgen, K. (2022): Intersectional Inequality in Education. 37th IARIW General Conference.
  46. Miyamoto, A., Seuring, J., & Kristen, C. (2020): Immigrant students’ achievements in light of their educational aspirations and academic motivation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(7), 1348–1370. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1538772
  47. Nash, J. C. (2011): Home Truths on Intersectionality. Yale J.L. & Feminism, 445.
  48. Petrušauskaitė, V. (2014): Ankstyvas romų vaikų pasitraukimas iš švietimo sistemos Vilniaus mieste: švietimo lauko analizė [Early school leaving among Roma children in Vilnius city: Analysis of education sector]. Doctoral dissertation. Vilnius: Vilnius University.
  49. Pierson, P. (2000): Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 92(4), 251–267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011
  50. Rice, C., Harrison, E., & Friedman, M. (2019): Doing Justice to Intersectionality in Research. Cultural Studies. Critical Methodologies, 19(6), 409-420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086198297
  51. Robert, S. A., & Yu, M. (2018): Intersectionality in Transnational Education Policy Research. Review of Research in Education, 42, 93-121.
  52. Sabatier, P. (1988): An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21, 128–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406
  53. Schiller, N. (2000): A Short History of Black Feminist Scholars. The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 29, 119–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2678863
  54. Schnell, P., & Fibbi, R. (2016): Getting Ahead: Educational and Occupational Trajectories of the ‘New’ Second- Generation in Switzerland. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 17(4), 1085–1107. DOI: 10.1007/s12134-015-0452-y
  55. Semmelweis University (n.d.): About Conductive Education. https://semmelweis.hu/pak/en/about-conductive-education/#:~:text=Conductive%20Education%20is%20a%20comprehensive,learn%20through%20normal%20life%20experiences.
  56. Smith, K., & Joyce, K. (2012): Capturing complex realities: understanding efforts to achieve evidence-based policy and practice in public health. Evidence and Policy, 81, 57-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/174426412X6201371
  57. Swiss Federal Council. (2021): 2030 Sustainable Development Strategy. Retrieved from https://www.are.admin.ch/dam/are/de/dokumente/nachhaltige_entwicklung/publikationen/sne2030.pdf.download.pdf/Strategie%20Nachhaltige%20En
  58. Tavares, B. (2020): Compounding forms of inequality: Cape Verdean migrants’ struggles in education and beyond in Luxembourg. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 307–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2020-0007
  59. Tedds, L. M. (2022): Igniting an Intersectional Shift in Public Policy Research (and Training): Canadian Public Policy Special Lecture. Munich: Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
  60. Uzunöz, M., & Yurdakul, A. (2021): Intersectional challenges in the labor market: The case of Roma women. In M. İ. Yenilmez, & G. Ş. Huyugüzel Kişla, The economics of gender equality in the labour market (pp. 172-186). New York: Routledge.
  61. Vázquez-Cupeiro, S., Alonso, C., García Arnau, A., & Curran, M. (2022): Country report Spain on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Madrid: Universidad Complutense Madrid.
  62. Varsik, S., & Gorochovskij, J. (2023): Intersectionality in education: Rationale and practices to address the needs of students’ intersecting identities. OECD.
  63. Vincze, E. (2013): Socio-spatial marginality of Roma as a form of intersectional injustice. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Sociologia, 58(2), 217-242.
  64. Toom, A., Kleemola, K., Hyytinen, H. and Tuononen, T. (in order of contribution) (2022). Country report Finland on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Helsinki: Helsingin Yliopisto.
  65. Bollig, S., Joos, M., Bindges, A-L., Herzer, M., Kliche, H., Rottwinkel, F., with contribution from Irena Kogan (Universität Mannheim) (2022). Country report Germany on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Trier: Universität Trier.
  66. Lőrincz, B. (2022). Country report Hungary on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Budapest: TÁRKI Társdalomkutatási Intézet Zrt. (TARKI).
  67. Darmody, M. and Smyth, E. (2022). Country report Ireland on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Dublin: The Economic and Social Research Institute.
  68. Bankauskaite, R. and Dunajeva, J. (2022). Country report Lithuania on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Vilnius: Public Policy and Management Institute.
  69. Torabian, J. and Hadjar, A. with contribution from Haas, C. and Powel, J. (2022). Country report Luxembourg on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Esch-sur-Alzette: University of Luxembourg.
  70. Joakim, J., Jobst, S., Nagy, H.M., Strand, D., Thyssen, G. and Skrobanek, J. [alphabetical order] in collaboration with Kvaale-Conateh L.A. (2022). Country report Norway on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Bergen: Western Norway University of Applied Sciences and University of Bergen.
  71. Vázquez-Cupeiro, S., Alonso, C., García Arnau, A. and Curran, M. (2022). Country report Spain on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Madrid: Universidad Complutense Madrid.
  72. Erzinger, A.B., Seiler, S., Winkler, A., Benz, R. and Cümen, D. (2022). Country report Switzerland on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Bern: Universität Bern (UBERN)