Vol. 14 No. 2 (2023)
Studies

Comparative Psychological Content Analysis of Collective Victimhood in Hungarian National Narratives Among Emigrant and Non-Emigrant Groups

Published 25-12-2023

Keywords

  • narrative psychology,
  • collective victim consciousness,
  • emigration,
  • agency

Abstract

Present research aims to identify narrative markers of victimization comparing narratives of emigrant Hungarians in the UK and non-emigrant Hungarians. 121 interviews were collected and analyzed via automatic content analysis software (NarrCat). 54 non-emigrant Hungarians and 67 emigrant Hungarians participated in our sample (average age: 45.65, 71,5% female). Our research has proven that victimization has narrative markers (low agency and psychological perspective taking and increased amount of negative evaluation) that can be identified in narratives related to individual path and national history. MANOVA analysis showed that more narrative markers of victimization can be found in the narratives of non-emigrants while more agency is observable in the narratives of emigrants. The result of narrative analysis was underlined by the fact that emigration also had significant effect on perceived importance of past victimization. Our conclusion suggests that differences can be observed in the construction of narratives and consequently in the interpretation of perceived collective victim consciousness of emigrant and non-emigrant groups.

References

  1. Adwan, S. (2001): Schoolbooks in the Making: From Conflict to Peace; A Critical Analysis of the New Palestinian Textbooks for Grades One and Six. Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics, and Culture, 8(2), 57.
  2. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991): Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of personality and social psychology, 60(2), pp. 241-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241
  3. Bar-Tal, D., Chernyak-Hai, L., Schori, N., & Gundar, A. (2009): A sense of self-perceived collective victimhood in intractable conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross, 91(874), pp. 229-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1816383109990221
  4. Batson, C. D. (1994): Why act for the public good? Four answers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), pp. 603-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205016
  5. Bilewitz, M., Winiewski, M., Kofta, M., & Wójcik, A. (2013): Harmful Ideas, The Structure and Consequences of Anti‐Semitic Beliefs in Poland. Political Psychology, 34(6), pp. 821-839. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pops.12024
  6. Brown, R. (2000): Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European journal of social psychology, 30(6), pp. 745-778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6%3C745::AID-EJSP24%3E3.0.CO;2-O
  7. Csertő I., & László J. (2011): A Csoportközi értékelés mint a csoporttrauma érzelmi feldolgozásának indikátora a nemzeti történelem elbeszéléseiben. In. Tanács A., Vincze V. (szerk.). VIII. Magyar Számítógépes Nyelvészeti Konferencia: MSZNY 2011, pp. 212-222.
  8. Ehmann B., Csertő I., Ferenczhalmy R., Fülöp É., Hargitai R., Kővágó P., ... & László J. (2014): Narratív kategoriális tartalomelemzés: a NARRCAT.
  9. Frieze, I. H., & Li, M. Y. (2010): Mobility and personality. In: S. C. Carr (Ed.), The psychology of global mobility, Springer Science + Business Media. pp. 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6208-9_5
  10. Ferenczhalmy R., Szalai K., & László J. (2011): Az ágencia szerepe történelmi szövegekben a nemzeti identitás szempontjából. Pszichológia, 31(1), pp. 35-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/Pszicho.31.2011.1.4
  11. Fülöp, É., & László, J. (2006): Az elbeszélések érzelmi aspektusának vizsgálata tartalomelemző program segítségével. Magyar Számítógépes Nyelvészeti Konferencia, Szeged, pp. 296-304
  12. Goodman, Y. C., & Mizrachi, N. (2008): “The Holocaust does not belong to European Jews alone”: The differential use of memory techniques in Israeli high schools. American Ethnologist, 35(1), pp. 95-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2008.00008.x
  13. Halloran, M. J., & Kashima, E. S. (2004): Social identity and worldview validation: The effects of ingroup identity primes and mortality salience on value endorsement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), pp. 915-925. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264080
  14. Hammack, P. L. (2011): Narrative and the politics of meaning. Narrative Inquiry, 21(2), pp. 311-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ni.21.2.09ham
  15. Jokela, M. (2014): Personality and the realization of migration desires. In: P. J. Rentfrow (Ed.), Geographical psychology: Exploring the interaction of environment and behavior. American Psychological Association. pp. 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/14272-005
  16. Khalili, L. (2008): Commemorating battles and massacres in the Palestinian refugee camps of Lebanon. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(11), pp. 1562-1574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764208316357
  17. László J. (2003): History, identity and narratives. In: Theories and controversies in societal psychology, Budapest: Új Mandátum Könyvkiadó, pp. 180-192.
  18. László J. (2005): A történetek tudománya - Bevezetés a narratív pszichológiába. Budapest: Új Mandátum Könyvkiadó.
  19. László J. (2008): Narratív pszichológia. Pszichológia, 28(4), pp. 301-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/Pszicho.28.2008.4.1
  20. László J. (2012): Történelem történetek. Bevezetés a narratív szociálpszichológiába. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
  21. László J., Csertő I., Fülöp É., Ferenczhalmy R., Hargitai R., Lendvai P., ... & Ehmann B. (2013): Narrative language as an expression of individual and group identity: The narrative categorical content analysis. Sage Open, 3(2), doi:2158244013492084. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244013492084
  22. László J., Forgas J. P., & Vincze O. (2013): The Role of Narrative Perspective in the Elaboration of Individual and Historical Traumas. In: Social Cognition and Communication. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 243-258
  23. László J., Fülöp É. (2011): Nemzeti identitás és kollektív áldozati szerep. Pszichológia, 31 (3), pp. 295-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/Pszicho.31.2011.3.6
  24. MacDonald, D. B. (2003): Daring to compare: the debate about a Maori “holocaust” in New Zealand”. Journal of Genocide Research, 5(3), pp. 383-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1462352032000154624
  25. Mészáros N. Z., Vámos E., & Szabó Z. P. (2017): Sérülékeny identitás a kollektív áldozati tudat pszichológiai hatásai. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 72(3), pp. 345-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/0016.2017.003
  26. Olick, J. K., & Robbins, J. (1998): Social memory studies: From “collective memory” to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices. Annual Review of sociology, 24(1), pp. 105-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.105
  27. Pólya T. (2004): A narratív perspektíva hatása az elbeszélő személy észlelésére. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 59(3), pp. 377-395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/mpszle.59.2004.3.6
  28. Pólya T. (2007): Identitás az elbeszélésben. Budapest: Új Mandátum Kiadó
  29. Population of the UK by country of birth and nationality: 2017. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration/bulletins/ukpopulationbycountryofbirthandnationality/2017 Downloaded: 02-04-2022
  30. Staub, E., & Vollhardt, J. (2008): Altruism born of suffering: The roots of caring and helping after victimization and other trauma. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 78(3), pp. 267-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014223
  31. Tóth J., Vincze O., & László J. (2006): Történelmi elbeszélés és nemzeti identitás. Az Osztrák–Magyar Monarchia reprezentációja osztrák és magyar történelemkönyvekben. Educatio, 15(1), pp. 174-182.
  32. Vincze O., Tóth J., & László J. (2007): Representations of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy in the history books of the two nations. Empirical Text and Culture Research, 3, pp. 62-71.
  33. Vollhardt, J. R. (2012): Collective victimization. In: Oxford Handbook of Intergroup Conflict, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.136-157.