Vol. 26 No. 1 (2025): Per i 70 anni di Giampaolo Salvi
Per i 70 anni di Giampaolo Salvi

La posizione dei pronomi clitici nella ristrutturazione: variazione diatopica e diacronica in italo-romanzo

Anna Cardinaletti
Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia
Giuliana Giusti
Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia

Published 10-07-2025

Keywords

  • restructuring,
  • clitic pronouns,
  • clitic climbing,
  • enclisis,
  • Italo-Romance dialects,
  • Italian,
  • diatopic variation,
  • diachronic change,
  • weak pronouns,
  • Latin

How to Cite

Cardinaletti, A., & Giusti, G. (2025). La posizione dei pronomi clitici nella ristrutturazione: variazione diatopica e diacronica in italo-romanzo. Verbum – Analecta Neolatina, 26(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.59533/Verb.2025.26.1.3

Abstract

In Italian and Italo-Romance dialects, the position of clitic pronouns in restructuring sentences is subject to variation. Like Italian, the northern, Tuscan, and median Italo-Romance dialects show both cliticization on the finite verb (clitic climbing) and enclisis on the infinitival verb, while the southern dialects have mandatory clitic climbing. Some differences between the AIS data, dating back to one century ago, and the contemporary dialectal data with regard to clitic climbing in northern dialects are attributed to the data collection methods and not to a recent diachronic change extending climbing towards the North. A new data collection method, specially designed to detect optionality, provides a more nuanced picture of language variation and suggests that the innovation of enclisis is starting to affect the southern Italo-Romance dialects.

References

  1. Alibèrt, L. (1976): Gramatica occitana segon los parlars lengadocians. Montpellier: Centre d’estudis occitans.
  2. Bekowies, Z. & M. McLaughlin (2020): The loss of clitic climbing in French. In: S. Wolfe & M. Maiden (eds.) Variation and Change in Gallo-Romance Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 138–157.
  3. Birdsong D., L. M. Gertken & M. Amengual (2012): Bilingual Language Profile: An Easy-to-Use Instrument to Assess Bilingualism. COERLL: University of Texas at Austin.
  4. Cardinaletti, A. (2010): Il pronome personale obliquo. In: G. Salvi & L. Renzi (eds.), Grammatica dell’italiano antico. Bologna: il Mulino. Vol. I, 414–450.
  5. Cardinaletti, A. & G. Giusti (2018): Indefinite determiners: Variation and optionality in Italo-Romance. In R. D’Alessandro & D. Pescarini (eds.) Advances in Italian Dialectology. Amsterdam: Brill. 135–161.
  6. Cardinaletti, A. & G. Giusti (2020): Multiple agreement in southern Italian dialects. In: L. Franco & P. Lorusso (eds.) Linguistic variation: structure and interpretation. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. 125–148.
  7. Cardinaletti, A. & U. Shlonsky (2004): Clitic positions and restructuring in Italian. Linguistic Inquiry 35(4): 519–557.
  8. Cardinaletti, A. & M. Starke (1999): The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In: H. van Riemsdijk (ed.) Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 145–233.
  9. Cardinaletti A., G. Giusti & G. E. Lebani (2024): Clitic climbing across Italy: Variation, optionality, and the role of bilectalism, di prossima pubblicazione in Linguistic Variation.
  10. Davies, M. (1995): Analyzing Syntactic Variation with Computer-Based Corpora: The Case of Modern Spanish Clitic Climbing. Hispania 78(2): 370–380.
  11. Davies, M. (1996): A corpus-based approach to diachronic clitic climbing in Portuguese. Hispanic Journal 17(1): 93–111.
  12. de Andrade, A. L. & C. Namiuti-Temponi (2016): Gone without the verb: Clitic interpolation and clitic climbing in the history of Portuguese. Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos 58(2): 201–219.
  13. Egerland, V. (2009): La doppia base della ristrutturazione. In: A. Cardinaletti & N. Munaro (eds.) Italiano, italiani regionali e dialetti. Milano: Franco Angeli. 99–114.
  14. Egerland, V. (2010): Frasi subordinate all’infinito. In; G. Salvi & L. Renzi (eds.) Grammatica dell’italiano antico. Bologna: il Mulino. Vol. II, 817–835.
  15. Fischer, S. (2000): Obligatory Clitic Climbing in Old Catalan. Linguistics in Potsdam 9: 63–76.
  16. Giusti, G. & A. Cardinaletti (2022): Theory-driven approaches and empirical advances: A protocol for Pseudo-Coordinations and Multiple Agreement Constructions in Italo-Romance. In: G. Giusti, V. N. Di Caro & D. Ross (eds.) Pseudo-Coordinations and Multiple Agreement Constructions. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 35–63.
  17. Horváth, M. (2008): Les Pronoms Clitiques du Francoprovençal: l’Etude du Dialecte de Pelussin. Verbum 10(1): 227–256.
  18. Jaber, K. & J. Jud (1928–40): Sach- und Sprachatlas Italiens und der Südschweiz. Zofingen: Ringier.
  19. Jones, M. (1997): Sardinian. In: M. Harris & N. Vincent (eds.) The Romance Languages. London: Croom Helm. 314–350.
  20. Kayne, R. S. (1989): Null Subjects and Clitic Climbing. In: O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (eds.). The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Reidel. 239–261.
  21. Kayne, R. S. (1991): Romance clitics, verb movement and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22(4): 647–686.
  22. Ledgeway, A. (2016a): Italian, Tuscan, and Corsican. In: A. Ledgeway & M. Maiden (eds.) The Oxford Guide to the Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 206–227.
  23. Ledgeway, A. (2016b): The dialects of southern Italy. In: A. Ledgeway & M. Maiden (eds.) The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 246–269.
  24. Loporcaro, M. & T. Paciaroni (2016): The Dialects of central Italy. In: A. Ledgeway & M. Maiden (eds.) The Oxford Guide to the Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 228–245.
  25. Maiden, M. (2016): Romanian, Istro-Romanian, Megleno-Romanian, and Aromanian. In: A. Ledgeway & M. Maiden (eds.)] The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages[. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 91–125.
  26. Manzini, M. R. & L. M. Savoia (2005): I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.
  27. Olivier, M. (2021): A Corpus Study of Clitic Placement with Infinitives in the Diachrony of French. Doctoral Dissertation. Belfast: Ulster University.
  28. Pellegrini, G. B. (1960): Tra lingua e dialetto in Italia. Studi mediolatini e volgari VIII: 137–155.
  29. Procentese, C., V. N. Di Caro & G. E. Lebani (2022a): Assessing language dominance in Italo-Romance bilectals with the Dilalic Language Profile: a preliminary pilot study. Talk given at Language Attitudes and Bi(dia)lectal Competence (LaBiC), Venice, 12–13/09/2022.
  30. Procentese, C., V. N. Di Caro & G. E. Lebani (2022b): Understanding modern society’s linguistic landscape in bilectal scenarios: the Dilalic Language Profile. Talk given at LingO 2022, Oxford, 24/06/2022.
  31. Rigau, G. (2005): Number agreement variation in Catalan dialects. In: G. Cinque & R. S. Kayne (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 775–805.
  32. Rizzi, L. (1978/1982): A restructuring rule in Italian syntax. In: S. J. Keyser (ed.), Recent Transformational Studies in European languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 113–158 (reprinted in Issues in Italian Syntax, 1982, Dordrecht, Foris).
  33. Roberts, I. (2016): Object clitics. In: A. Ledgeway & M. Maiden (eds.) The Oxford Guide to the Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 786–801.
  34. Salvi, G. (2001): La nascita dei pronomi clitici romanzi. Romanische Forschungen 113: 285–319.
  35. Salvi, G. (2004): La formazione della struttura di frase romanza: ordine delle parole e clitici dal latino alle lingue romanze antiche. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
  36. Tisato, G. (2009): AIS Digital Atlas and Navigation Software, https://navigais-web.pd.istc.cnr.it/.
  37. Trovato, S. & S. Menza (2020): Vocabolario del dialetto gallo-italico di Nicosia e Sperlinga. Palermo: Centro di Studi Filologici e Linguistici Siciliani.
  38. Wackernagel, J. (1892): Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung. Indogermanische Forschungen 1(1): 333–436.
  39. Wanner, D. (1982): A History of Spanish Clitic Movement. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 135–147.
  40. Zennaro, L. (2006): La sintassi dei verbi a ristrutturazione in latino. Tesi di Dottorato. Venezia: Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia.