Morfosintassi, semantica, concettualizzazione: costanti e varianti nell’uso dell’articolo definito
Published 10-07-2025
Keywords
- article,
- definite article,
- definiteness,
- definite descriptions,
- expletive article,
- individuation
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2025 Paolo Acquaviva

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The definite article is traditionally identified with the linguistic expression of a definite description. In grammatical systems akin to those of Western European languages, the only variation would lie in the presence or absence of the article in generics (water / l’acqua). This simplistic approach has sidelined a whole range of alternative uses of the article, known but kept aside as irrelevant. This study systematically overviews this variation space. The reading as definite description or generic is its core, where variation is driven deterministically by the nominal’s denotation and by the morphosyntax of the relevant language. But the function of uniquely identifying the referent in the pragmatic and encyclopaedic context underlies more uses of the article. They outline a broader variation space, which seems arbitrary only because the relevant factors are not just strictly grammatical but also communicative.
References
- Aguilar-Guevara, Ana & Joosts Zwarts (2010): Weak definites refer to Kinds. In N. Li & D. Lutz (eds.) Proceedings of SALT 20. 179–196. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v20i0.2583%20
- Ashdowne, Richard (2004): Re(de)fining address: an overlooked French phenomenon. In Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics 9: 1–36.
- Elbourne, Paul (2013): Definite Descriptions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Frege, Gottlob Wilhelm (1892): Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100: 25–50.
- Gallmann, Peter (2004): Kategoriell Komplexe Wortformen. Berlin: De Gruyter.
- Giusti, Giuliana (2015): Nominal Syntax at the Interfaces. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Haspelmath, Martin (2001): The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Haspelmath, M, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (eds.) Language Typology and Language Universals, vol. 2. Berlin: De Gruyter. 1492–1510. https://doi.org/10.1515%2F9783110194265-044
- Heim, Irene (1991): Artikel und Definitheit. In A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (eds.) Semantik / Semantics: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung. Berlin - New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 487–535 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110126969.7.487
- Heim, Irene (1982): The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
- Jaspers, Karl (1998)[1953]: Einführung in die Philosophie. Piper: München - Zürich.
- Krifka, Manfred, Francis-Jeffry Pelletier, Gregory Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Gennaro Chierchia, Goderad Link (1995): Genericity: An introduction. In G. Carlson & F.-J. Pelletier (eds.) The Generic Book. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 1–124.
- Laca, Brenda (1990): Generic objects: Some more pieces of the puzzle. Lingua 81: 25–46.
- Löbner, Sebastian (1985): Definites. Journal of Semantics 4: 279–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/4.4.279
- Mathieu, Éric (2009): From Local Blocking to Cyclic Agree: The role and meaning of determiners in the history of French. In J. Ghomeshi, I. Paul, and M. Wiltschko (eds.) Determiners: Universals and Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.147.04mat
- Rabern, Brian (2015): Descriptions which have grown capital letters. Mind and Language 30: 292–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12081
- Russell, Bertrand (1905): On denoting. Mind 14: 479–493.
- Strawson, Peter (1950): On referring. Mind 59: 320–344.
- Zamparelli, Roberto (2002): Definite and bare kind-denoting nouns phrases. In F. Drijkoningen, C. Beyssade, P. Monachesi and R. Bok-Bennema (eds) Romance languages and linguistic theory 2000. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.232.17zam