Vol. 18 No. 1-2 (2017)
Critica

Apologie d'un monstre sacré: Dialogues. Rousseau juge de J.-J.

Paula Marsó
Université Eötvös Loránd

Published 01-12-2017

How to Cite

Marsó, P. (2017). Apologie d’un monstre sacré: Dialogues. Rousseau juge de J.-J. Verbum – Analecta Neolatina, 18(1-2), 135–147. Retrieved from https://ojs.ppke.hu/verbum/article/view/341

Abstract

One of Rousseau’s last writings, Dialogues. Rousseau juge de J.-J. (Dialogues. Rousseau, judge of J.-J.) has long been viewed as evidence of his paranoia. It consists of three dialogues between a character named “Rousseau” and one identified as “Frenchman” who discuss the bad reputation and works of an author named “Jean-Jacques”. Rousseau sought to justify his entire career and undertook his most comprehensive reflection on himself as an author, his books, and his audience.