Conspiracy Theories and Populism: Analyzing the Trumpian Embrace of Conspiracy Narratives as a Political Instrument

Dóra Busi

doi:10.69705/FHS.2023.1.2.11

Authors

Dóra Busi Pázmány Péter Catholic University Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69705/FHS.2023.1.2.11

Abstract

The attack on its Capitol on January 6, 2021, was an unprecedented event in the history of the United States. It was made more peculiar by the fact that the conspiracy theory (CT) that the election had been fraudulent was spread by the outgoing president, Donald Trump, too. The purpose of this research is to show that CTs are suitable political tools for populists, as both are based on the division of society and appeal to alienated, dissatisfied groups. The main conclusion of the research is that populism and CTs spread because of political polarization, which, in turn, these narratives themselves deepen. For this reason, the populist use of conspiracy theories is almost inevitable.

References

Abts, K., & Baute, S. (2022). Social resentment, blame attribution and Euroscepticism: The role of status insecurity, relative deprivation and powerlessness. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35(1), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2021.1964350

Aliapoulios, M., Papasavva, A., Ballard, C., De Cristofaro, E., Stringhini, G., Zannettou, S., & Blackburn, J. (2022). The Gospel according to Q: Understanding the QAnon conspiracy from the perspective of canonical information. 16th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.08750

Arato, A. (2019). How we got here? Transition failures, their causes and the populist interest in the constitution. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 45(9-10), 1106–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453719872290

Baker, J. O., Perry, S. L., & Whitehead, A. L. (2020). Keep America Christian (and white): Christian nationalism, fear of ethnoracial outsiders, and intention to vote for Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election. Sociology of Religion, 81(3), 272–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/sraa015

Benedek I. (2021). Riders on the storm: the role of populism in the global crisis of democracy and in the functioning of electoral autocracies. Politics in Central Europe, 17(2), 197–225. https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2021-0009

Berlet, C., & Lyons, M. N. (2000). Right-wing populism in America: Too close for comfort. The Guilford Press.

Berman, S. (2021). The causes of populism in the West. Annual Review of Political Science, 24(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102503

Blanco, A., Wolfe, D., & Gardner, A. (2022). Tracking which 2020 election deniers are winning, losing in the midterms. The Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2022/election-deniers-midterms/

Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2022). Cross-country trends in affective polarization. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01160

Brewster, J., Palmer, C., & Walid, S. (2022). Misinformation Monitor: August 2022. NewsGuard, https://www.newsguardtech.com/misinformation-monitor/august-2022/

Bugaric, B., & Kuhelj, A. (2018). Varieties of populism in Europe: Is the rule of law in danger? Hague Journal on the Rule Law, (10), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0075-4

Clarke, S. (2022). Is there a new conspiracism? Social Epistemology, 37(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2022.2057369

Cordonier, L., Cafiero, F., & Bronner, G. (2021). Why are conspiracy theories more successful in some countries than in others? An exploratory study on Internet users from 22 Western and non-Western countries. Social Science Information, 60(3), 436–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901842110189

Cox, D. A. (2021). After the ballots are counted: Conspiracies, political violence, and American exceptionalism. Survey Center on American Life, https://www.americansurveycenter.org/research/after-the-ballots-are-counted-conspiracies-political-violence-and-american-exceptionalism

Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261

Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019) Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568

Draca, M., & Schwarz, C. (2018) How polarized are citizens? Measuring ideology from the ground-up. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3154431

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.

Frimer, J. A., Skitka., L. B., & Motyl, M. (2017). Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another’s opinions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.003

Gabbatt, A. (2020). Trump refuses to disavow QAnon conspiracy theory during town hall. The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/oct/15/qanon-trump-refuses-disavow-conspiracy-theory-town-hall

Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, W. (2020). American affective polarization in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914123

Gilbert, D. (2021a). Trump has officially declared his embrace of Qanon. VICE, https://www.vice.com/en/article/m7g7y4/trump-qanon-mar-a-lago

Gilbert, D. (2021b). Trump’s not even pretending to hide his support for QAnon any more. VICE, https://www.vice.com/en/article/epzbya/trump-support-qanon

Giry, J., & Tika, P. (2021). Conspiracy theories in political science and political theory. In M. Butter & P. Knight (Eds.), Routledge handbook of conspiracy theories (pp. 108–120), Routledge.

Graff, G. M. (2020). 9/11 and the rise of the new conspiracy theorists. The Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com/articles/9-11-and-the-rise-of-the-new-conspiracy-theorists-11599768458

Hofstadter, R. (1964, November). The paranoid style in American politics. Harper’s Magazine, 77–86. https://harpers.org/archive/1964/11/the-paranoid-style-in-american-politics/

Hughes, S., & Machan, L. (2021). It’s a conspiracy: Covid-19 conspiracies link to psychopathy, Machiavellianism and collective narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, (171), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110559

Imhoff, R., Zimmer, F., Klein, O., António, J. H. C., Babinska, M., Bangerter, A., Bilewicz, M., Blanuša, N., Bovan, K., Bužarovska, R., Cichocka, A., Delouvée, S., Douglas, K. M., Dyrendal, A., Etienne, T., Gjoneska, B., Graf, S., Gualda, E., Hirschberger, G., van Prooijen, J-W. (2022). Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries. Nature Human Behavior, (6), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01258-7

Iyengar, S. (2022). Fear and loathing in American politics: A review of affective polarisation. In D. Osborne & C. G. Sibley (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology (pp. 399–413). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108779104.028

Keefer, P., Scartascini, C. G., & Vlaicu, R. (2019). Social trust and electoral populism: Explaining the quality of government. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3460914

Kessler, G. (2021). Trump made 30,573 false or misleading claims as president. Nearly half came in his final year. The Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-fact-checker-tracked-trump-claims/2021/01/23/ad04b69a-5c1d-11eb-a976-bad6431e03e2_story.html

Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Mothes, C., & Polavin, N. (2020). Confirmation bias, ingroup bias, and negativity bias in selective exposure to political information. Communication Research, 47(1), 104–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217719596

Kumar, A., & Orr, G. (2020). Inside Trump’s pressure campaign to overturn the election. Politico, https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/21/trump-pressure-campaign-overturn-election-449486

Kunzelman, M. (2020). AP Explains: What’s behind Trump’s town hall answer on QAnon. AP News, https://www.apnews.com/article/trump-town-hall-qanon-explained-b4614edad1aae27a0cbcb9dfe0c0c44c

Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.

Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M., & Horowitz, J. M. (2006). Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, 9(1), 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.070204.105138

McIntire, M., Yourish, K., & Buchanan, L. (2019). In Trump's Twitter feed: Conspiracy-mongers, racists and spies. The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/11/02/us/politics/trump-twitter-disinformation.html

Metzger, M. J., Hartsell, E. H., & Flanagin, A. J. (2020). Cognitive dissonance or credibility? A comparison of two theoretical explanations for selective exposure to partisan news. Communication Research, 47(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215613136

Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Kiley, J., & Matsa, K. E. (2014). Political polarization & media habits. Pew Research Center, https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2014/10/21/political-polarization-media-habits/

Molloy, D. (2018). What is populism, and what does the term actually mean? BBC, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-43301423

Montgomery, M. (2017). Post-truth politics? Authenticity, populism and the electoral discourses of Donald Trump. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 619–39. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17023.mon

Neville-Shepard, R. (2019). Post-presumption argumentation and the post-truth world: on the conspiracy rhetoric of Donald Trump. Argumentation and Advocacy, 55(3), 175–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2019.1603027

Noland, M. (2020). Protectionism under Trump: The China shock, intolerance, and the 'first white President.' Asian Economic Policy Review, 15(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12274

Ostiguy, P., & Roberts, K. M. (2016). Putting Trump in comparative perspective: populism and the politicization of the sociocultural low. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 23(1), 25–50. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26534708

Oswald, M., Schäfer, M., & Broda, E. (2022). The new age of populism: Reapproaching a diffuse concept. In M. Oswald (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Populism (pp. 3–27). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_1

Pew Research Center. (2021a). Americans differ from people in other societies over some aspects of U.S. ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ power. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/11/01/americans-differ-from-people-in-other-societies-over-some-aspects-of-u-s-hard-and-soft-power/

Pew Research Center. (2021b). Behind Biden’s 2020 victory. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/06/30/behind-bidens-2020-victory/

Pirro, A. L. P., & Portos, M. (2021). Populism between voting and non-electoral participation. West European Politics, 44(3), 558–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1739451

Rose, J. (2020). Even if it's 'bonkers,' poll finds many believe QAnon and other conspiracy theories. NPR, https://www.npr.org/2020/12/30/951095644/even-if-its-bonkers-poll-finds-many-believe-qanon-and-other-conspiracy-theories

Schulte-Sasse, L. (1993). Meet Ross Perot: The lasting legacy of Capraesque populism. Cultural Critique, 25, 91–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/1354562

Seidel, A. L. (2022). Attack on the capitol: evidence of the role of white Christian nationalism. In Christian nationalism at the January 6, 2021, Insurrection, (pp. 25-40). Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty and Freedom From Religion Foundation.

Singman, B. (2021). Trump slams his VP, says Pence 'didn't have the courage' to decertify results of presidential election. Fox News, https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-slams-pence-says-he-didnt-have-the-courage-to-decertify-results-of-presidential-election

Spruyt, B., Keppens, G., & Van Droogenbroeck, F. (2016). Who supports populism and what attracts people to it? Political Research Quarterly, 69(2), 335–46. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44018014

Sternisko, A., Cichocka, A., Cislak, A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2021). National narcissism predicts the belief in and the dissemination of conspiracy theories during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from 56 countries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211054947

Trump, D. J. [@realDonaldTrump]. (2018a). The United States has an $800 Billion Dollar Yearly Trade Deficit because of our “very stupid” trade deals and policies [Tweet]. X. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/969991653393039361

Trump, D. J. [@realDonaldTrump]. (2018b). Why should I, as President of the United States, allow countries to continue to make Massive Trade Surpluses, as they [Tweet]. X. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1005982266496094209

Trump, D. J. (2020). The President’s news conference. The American Presidency Project, transcribed by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/the-presidents-news-conference-1258

Trump, D. J. [@realDonaldTrump]. (2021a). Why haven’t they done signature verification in Fulton County, Georgia. Why haven’t they deducted all of the dead people who [Tweet]. X. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1345404682655707136

Trump, D. J. [@realDonaldTrump]. (2021b). Washington is being inundated with people who don’t want to see an election victory stolen by emboldened Radical Left Democrats [Tweet]. X. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1346578706437963777

Trump, D. J. [@realDonaldTrump]. (2021c). I am asking for everyone at the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence! Remember, WE are the Party of [Tweet]. X. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1346912780700577792

Trump Twitter Archive. (n.d.). Insults as President. Trump Twitter Archive. https://www.thetrumparchive.com/insights/insults

Tushnet, M. (2019). Varieties of Populism. German Law Journal, 20(3), 382–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.27

Uscinski, J. E., & Parent, J. M. (2014). American Conspiracy Theories. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199351800.001.0001

Watson, H. L. (2017). Andrew Jackson’s Populism. Tennessee Historical Quarterly, 76(3), 218–39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26540290